Title : Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26
link : Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26
Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26
What is the potential difference between fasting and Low-carb high fat (LCHF)? Sometimes it feels as if the argument Batman or Superman is more powerful (Superman, of course). But the two are superheroes, and the point of these two regimes superhero in the diet is to lower insulin. This stems from a rational discussion about the causes of obesity and type 2 diabetes is necessary to understand the etiology of obesity (the underlying cause) if they have any hope of treating it. 
For decades, we have worked under the false assumption that obesity caused excessive calories. However, overfeeding and anoxia studies clearly demonstrated this hypothesis wrong. If calories caused obesity, then overfeeding calories should cause obesity. He did, but only in the short term. In the long term, the weight returned to normal. Calorie malnutrition on the contrary, should lead to permanent weight loss. But he did not. The failure rate of this caloric reduction as a primary strategy is a dismal 99%.
Using a more rational model of obesity as a hormonal disorder (mainly insulin but also cortisol) leads to the hypothesis that increased insulin should lead to increased lasting weight. Decreased insulin should lead to weight loss. And guess what? Has it worked as advertised. (See series hormonal obesity for a complete description).
Therefore, if we understand that excess insulin causes weight gain, then the treatment is quite clear and obvious really doomed. It is not necessary to reduce the calories, although there is some overlap. It is necessary that decrease insulin to cause weight loss . Both diets and fasts LCHF achieve this goal. Refined carbohydrates are the major stimulus to insulin, thus reducing carbohydrates reduces insulin. Protein, especially animal protein also raise insulin, so keep moderate in protein and high fat is another way to keep insulin levels down. Fasting, by restricting all, also keeps insulin low. A 'fast fat ", ie. Eating nothing but pure fat, you can also get the same result, but studies are scarce. So' coffee Bulletproof 'certainly can achieve the same goal of reducing insulin without reducing calories, but the data are simply can not say for sure. 
but what diet is best? LCHF or fasting? a comparison of energy shows that fasting is gaining time. in study of a diet free of carbohydrates vs fasting in type 2 diabetics, you can see that in free carbohydrates does extremely well. If we compare the glucose response of free carbohydrates versus a diet standard, you can see that the blood sugar come down. But fasting makes it even better.
If you are trying to lower blood glucose, there is nothing better on an empty stomach. After all , you can not go below zero Even then, carbohydrate-free diet does very well -. which gives 71% of the benefits of fasting, no real fast. The standard diet was 55% carbohydrate and 15% protein and 30% fat - not far from what most dietitians and dietary guidelines recommend. You can see how shit is to control blood glucose real.
The carbohydrate-free diet is <3% carbohydrate (ie ketogenic or ultra-low-carb), 15% protein (moderate) and 82% fat. LCHF practically says it all. Delivered calories were 25 kcal / kg (1750 calories for a 70 kg) in 3 meals - this was the same between the standard and no-carb diets. So that the benefits of carbohydrate restriction in blood glucose were NO simply because caloric restriction. This is useful knowledge, taking into account the amount of misinformed idiots doctors and dietitians keep saying 'It's all about the calories. "Indeed, in this study, that had nothing to do with calories .
Anyone who still believes that "it's all about the calories," despite 50 years of inexorable failure of calorie reduction as well primary model (APRC) or has not been thought about very difficult things or just not all that smart. Yes. If a strategy like CRAP failure for 50 years, we should be changing our strategy. it does not take Einstein to tell us that is the definition of insanity.
This graphic is quite instructive. as for the standard diet (ADA recommended), you can see how high glucose spikes actually get. you might legitimately wonder if the good people of the ADA know that your diet sends the rise in sugar blood up, why would you recommend? They're trying to kill us? Unfortunately, the answer is yes. They are trying to kill. Not intentionally, but their ignorance. All that money poured on them from Big Food and Big Pharma companies have something to do with it, too. 
But what is free of carbohydrates is not enough? I have a lot of patients who limit their carbohydrates, but still blood sugar have risen. How do you get more power? Sorry, Batman, it's time to call Superman. (Do not worry about the Fantastic Twins - were always useless One would become a dolphin or something.). In a word, we need fast
.The study results are even more impressive when you look at insulin levels. This is very important because glucose levels in the blood are not the main driver of obesity and diabetes. Insulin is the main driver. All weight loss strategy revolves around the reduction of insulin.
Looking at the total area under the curve, you can see that free carbohydrate diet can reduce insulin by about 50%, but can go another 50% by the fast. That's the power.
This makes sense, of course. A carbohydrate-free diet still contain some protein will increase insulin. The only way to get lower would be eating 100% fat - which is largely an artificial construct. That is, generally we do not eat pure olive oil as a food or pure lard. Bulletproof coffee is certainly a great 'trick' but has barely been tested by thousands of years of human history and millions of people. Fasting has survived the test of time. It is Anti-Fragile . How? The more we eat processed and ultra-processed garbage to behave food, the greater the need for fasting. If you eat a lot of fast food (foods that are ultra-processed and send exorbitant increase insulin) the more you need to fast (take insulin levels down).
And there's nothing like fasting insulin loss. This is simply the fastest and most effective method of reducing insulin. Fortunately, it is not as difficult as most people believe it to be.
What about glucagon? Remember that glucagon is kind of the opposite of insulin. A major physiological role of insulin is to suppress glucagon. Dr. Roger Unger did much to explore the biological role of glucagon and often considered the most important. However, in this study I had no clinical relevance at all. In dealing with patients, glucagon also plays little or no role.
Let me explain. Insulin causes weight gain - by giving insulin causes weight gain. What gains weight reduction glucagon cause? Not really. No increase glucagon causes weight loss? Not really. Sure, glucagon plays a major role in rat liver, but I do not care. I care about humans.
The conclusion of this study is to reinforce what we already knew. Insulin is the main (but not only) driver of obesity. Therefore, for most people, reducing insulin is the best method to treat obesity. Carb-free diets are an effective method of reducing insulin. But if that does not work, then intermittent fasting provides an even more powerful strategy.
In type 2 diabetes, you can reduce sugar levels by 50-70% in diets without carbohydrates. It can be reduced another 30% with fasting. Therefore, if we know how to reduce sugar levels in type 2 diabetes with dietary strategies - why do we need drugs at all? Here is the answer, of course. No . Type 2 diabetes is a totally reversible disease.
The post Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26 appeared first on https://intensivedietarymanagement.com/power-comparison-fasting-vs-low-carb-fasting-26/
Thanks for Reading Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26
You are now reading the article Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26 Url Address https://exerciseplanstoloseweight.blogspot.com/2016/03/energy-fasting-vs-low-carb-fasting-26.html
0 Response to "Energy: Fasting vs low carb - Fasting 26"
Posting Komentar