Title : The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant
link : The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant
The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant
There are many adherents of the calories in calories / Out of theory (CICO) that constantly bleating of "All it is reduced to the first law of thermodynamics. " The first law of thermodynamics refers to a law of physics that energy can not be created or destroyed in a closed system and is always true. It is certainly the case in the complex world of human physiology, but is entirely irrelevant. What the people CICO think it means is that if your calorie intake is reduced, you should lose weight. Of course, it does not mean anything like that. So, let's see why. The main reason is that the most important part of CICO is not the calories in calories, but out and insulin. Here is our representation of the human body. 
You Calories Calories burned and fat storage. This is, of course, the fatal flaw of CICO - there are two compartments where calories can go after eating, (burned calories and fat), not one. Not a problem a magazine. CICO adherents believe that it takes calories, subtract calories out and what is left is dumped into fat reserves as a potato in a sack. Therefore, they believe that fat stores are essentially unregulated. Every night, as a store manager to close their books, imagine the body counts up in calories, calories out and deposit the rest into fat "bank". Of course, nothing is further from the truth.
Instead, all processes of our body is highly regulated. Whether we burn calories as energy or if directed toward fat storage is tightly controlled by hormones. While we eat, calories come. Calories go as basal metabolism (used for vital organs, heat production, etc.) and exercise. Fat can enter the storage or storage can go. 
What controls this decision? We all agree that the main hormone involved is insulin. When we eat, insulin increases. Note that insulin does not respond to calories alike. Some calories (white bread) will increase much insulin, and other (butter) will not raise insulin at all. This should have been the first clue that calories are not the common language of weight gain / loss. The body has receptors for calories and has no way of measuring calories.
consider two foods that are equal calorific values - a plate of cookies in front of a salad with olive oil and salmon. As soon as you eat, the metabolic response of the body is completely different and easy to measure. One will increase insulin lot, and the other not. So why pretend that the body cares about the calories. That's like saying that foods that are blue are the same - whether blueberries or raspberries blue Gatorade. The body does not care about the color, so Why? Similarly, the body does not give two sh ** is on calories, so why should we? However, the body does not much care about the hormonal response to food you just ate.
Since we are eating more at that time that can be used by the body, some of this energy away food is stored, either in the form of glycogen or fat. This is the role of insulin. Food stores energy through the process of glycogen synthesis and de novo lipogenesis (making new fat in the liver). 
When we eat, insulin starts to fall. This is the first signal to stop storing energy from food. As we continue to fast (eg overnight), we have to pass some of this energy food back out of our stores to fuel our metabolism. Otherwise, we would die during sleep, which obviously does not happen. 
OK. So far so good. Now let's put some numbers on it. Let's assume that we are not gaining or losing weight, but have 100 pounds of fat we'd like to drop. Assuming an average daily intake of 2,000 calories. This is what it will look like.
Since calories in and calories out are balance and fat does not go up or down, everything is in balance. The body wants to burn 2000 calories to stay warm and feel good. So what happens when we decide to lose weight? CICO people say that all you have to do is reduce calories. You do not have to worry about what you're eating, because "everything comes down to calories." Therefore, eating a reduced calorie, low fat, high carbohydrate diet, insulin levels remain high, but the calories are reduced. They do it on shows like "The Biggest Loser ', but this is the exact same strategies that all universities and governments use as well. 
What?
intake of 1200 calories per day is reduced. Since insulin is still high, you can not get any energy from fat stores. Why? Because the diet strategy you are using (caloric reduction as primary) only deals with calorie reduction, no insulin. Remember that high insulin is telling the body to store energy as fat, or at least burn fat (inhibits lipolysis).
therefore, as you reduce your caloric intake to 1200 calories in the body is the force to reduce metabolism is only 1200 calories. No energy is available anywhere else. This is precisely what It occurred in the biggest loser as seen in the study presented in the New York Times . This is precisely what happens during any calorie reduction diet. That is why these diets are doomed to failure. This strategy studies estimate failure rates at 99%. Note that the first law of thermodynamics is not affected in any way. It is irrelevant .
The lower metabolism means that it feels feel cold, tired and hungry. Worse, the weight eventually plateaus and then as you decide that not worth it, you start eating more, say 1400 calories thinking that is still not used to eating more. hunger hormones are increased because the body wants to burn 2000 calories. You are only taking in 1400 and 1200 burning, so the weight starts to come back. Sounds familiar? 
Well, that was fun. What happens when dietary strategies instead target the insulin used? Low carb diets high in fat (LCHF), ketogenic diets, and the last reduction strategy fasting insulin, all aimed at reducing insulin. What happen?
From the point of these diets is to lower insulin, food stored energy (fat) can be divided to feed the body. Since the body wants to burn 2000 calories a day, 1,000 calories of fat and 1,000 calories of food is burned. What we can predict is that the basal metabolic rate remains the same, decreased appetite and weight is decreasing. Guess what? That is exactly what is shown in the studies. In the study by Dr. David Ludwig and Kevin Salas new study, ketogenic diets do not have this metabolic slowdown feared.
Remember, the body really want to burn 2000 calories a day. If insulin is low, then the body can get their energy from fat stores, as well as the food. Anecdotally, hunger decreases with ketogenic diets. Many people say they just want to eat 1000 calories because they are full. But they do not feel the same metabolic stop because the body is getting the rest of 1000 calories from fat. Note that there are no laws of thermodynamics are broken.
The effect is even more striking with fasting. I can only tell my experiences in the intensive dietary treatment program. We have put over 1000 people in fasts of different durations. Many drag as they have no energy. After fasting, your energy increases massively. But despite this, they report that their appetite has been reduced to almost a third of what it was previously. They often tell me they think their stomach has shrunk.
In a sense, it has done. But if people are eating less because they have less hunger and weight loss, that's great. Because we are now working with the body, rather than fight it. With calorie reduction diets, people are constantly fighting their hunger and deprive themselves of food. Here, people are moving away from food by their own will. Because we have reduced insulin. 
Notice, again, that the first law of thermodynamics is not broken . No calories created from nothing. It is simply irrelevant to human physiology. I studied biochemistry at the university and took a one-year course in thermodynamics. At no time did we never discussed the human body or weight gain / loss. Because it has nothing to do with thermodynamics. If someone mentions the "first law of thermodynamics' to weight loss, you also know that they are just very clever. Or maybe they just have not thought about it really is thermodynamics.
seems to you can not say enough about thermodynamics nutritionists, moreover, especially calorie counters ,. they envy "science." they desperately want the quantitative and theoretical support of hard science and therefore intended that physiology human is like physics, with its rules and tougher laws. 
New flash, guys. the physiology is physiology and physics is physics. Do not mess the two up. people CICO are Fregley. He is the character in "Diary of a Wimpy kid ', which is the unpopular kid who desperately wants to be loved. CICO people desperately want approval of hard science who are willing to pretend that physiology it is physics. I'm sorry friend. Just because you have physics envy, it does not mean you get to make up stuff. .... (I was going to put in a very crass and crude joke about Freud's concept of penis envy all for the sake of a cheap laugh. Against my better judgment, I have removed.)
also you can not use the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for your bowel movements. The Bernoulli effect is not applied to the flow of urine. Physics is physics. The physiology is physiology. Try with him.
Sometimes people ask me the question about the difference between fasting and calorie reduction. I do not fast cut calories? Yes, but that's not the point. Fasting is to reduce insulin. This allows you to release some of the energy stored fat so that you need not even want to eat so much.
What annoys me is this. The Biggest Loser study showed that cutting calories is one, is not good and very bad strategy awful, horrible, almost guaranteed to fail. Therefore, in all these articles about the study Kevin Hall, which suggest the 'experts' instead? Cut your calories !! The only thing worse are those "experts" who claim that it is not that key is to define the success of weight loss . Winning wars diet for even trying. Companion! People want to know how to lose weight. Success is defined as the weight, not love your body as it is. How would Justin Bieber - Go yourself. I want to know how to lose weight. That's what The obesity Code is. If you want to know how to lose weight, first understand what causes weight gain.
What happens when you recommend a diet that is guaranteed to fail? When can I get a global epidemic of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Unfortunately, all nutritional authorities all belong to the same sect CICO, and all that are paying the price for his stupidity. You thought that Scientology was bad. CICO is even worse. We will consider these simple facts. We have recommended calorie cutting to lose weight over the past 40 years. During that time, we had a huge epidemic of obesity. All science suggests that reducing calories as primary is doomed to failure. Experts, doctors and academic researchers virtually all health associations continue to recommend. Sheep are bleating constantly. Counting calories! Cut the calories! It comes down to the calories! Anyone who believes otherwise does not believe in the universal laws of nature! I envy of physics!
An article interviewed 'leading obesity experts' and came up with these tips. Exercise regularly. Reduce calories, avoiding high-fat foods. Have breakfast. Counting calories. So, in other words, that would give exactly the same advice we have been giving for the past 40 years, even when the obesity epidemic overwhelms our health care system. Hey, Julia Belluz, 1980 called, they want their diet advice again.
O ... ..M ... ..F ... ..g ....
The lunatics are running the asylum - and they all believe in the first law of thermodynamics. In the discussion of the physiology of obesity, the first law of thermodynamics is not bad -. It is irrelevant
The post The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant appeared first on https://intensivedietarymanagement.com/first-law-thermodynamics-irrelevant/
Thanks for Reading The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant
You are now reading the article The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant Url Address https://exerciseplanstoloseweight.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-reason-why-first-law-of.html
0 Response to "The reason why the first law of thermodynamics is totally irrelevant"
Posting Komentar