Title : Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law
link : Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law
Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law
I have a friend from high school, someone who I have always known to be incredibly friendly.
She confessed to me that he had finally seen one of these films snuff mainstream media of police officers who fill American citizens, human beings, with bullets for minor infractions, and was horrified by what he saw. And after realizing he had multiple videos to bear witness to it took to social networks to express their concern.
And almost instantly, she met critically charges love "thugs" challenges for intelligence, his complaints about not having spoken in support of the police, littering up the victims by education of their criminal records ... in my opinion, was relentless.
It is difficult for someone who only has a protest of "WTF HAPPEN?!" to refute these very specific criticisms, because it is waiting for the very human response of horrify to be met with questions of "how dare to be mortified by this?" which it is hoping people do not understand why the sudden loss of life from policing another stupid way traffic stops result in shock?
is an aggressive way to tell someone who has chosen the wrong side.
Our current political system has left many of us believe that there are always only two predefined sides to every situation. Or are pro-abortion or against it. Or are you to preserving the Second Amendment, or against it. Or are you of welfare programs, or against them. We do not allow space for nuance. These problems have no simple yes or no answers. Such is the case of the police and the pattern of people of color are overrepresented in shootouts with the police involved.
When nothing is known beyond the mouthfeel stomach "this only feels evil", what do you do? where do you go from there? I have some ideas.
1) When people try to ensure that it was not, in fact, wrong, or that the victim was a bully and therefore deserved, or that the police are entitled to defend their lives, and understand that they are speaking from that place of "there are only two sides here :. or the bully lives, or good" also understand that this is flawed, inaccurate and dangerous
.There are many cases where the police have to make decisions in fractions of saving lives, not only their own every day, and should be commended for it. But those split decisions not have to be fatal. There myriad ways to appease the meetings with the public that does not have to result in death by firearm . Police departments across the country have achieved this success. Police departments around the world have achieved this. There are countless videos on Facebook while typing at this time showing how police have successfully de-escalation events without weapons, or at least not fatal. We must have faith in the ability of people we put in positions of power such as the police, to achieve this.
(Also noteworthy? The tension ensures that a person with mental illness perceived as threatening behavior does not kill. )
2) When people seeks to ensure that the victim was a bully and, therefore, is not a victim but a criminal who got what he deserved understand that they are speaking from a place that believes that the key to avoid becoming a victim of police violence is "doing good."
These are people who have never understood how the way this country defines "bad" and the way that penalizes people. It is "bad" to be poor, so he is skeptical of those. People seem not to understand that their definitions of things like "goodness" center themselves, and often that means people who are not like they are, by extension, wrong. This often results in people considered to be "bad" and deserving of skepticism little taste different brands of clothes or shoes, musical taste different or have different hair. becomes a matter of "do not look like you belong here. Why are you here?"
Second, because "poor" by what has been deftly defined as "bad", we have police that looks explicitly for markers , for example, the "broken windows" poverty : to signal where police should look for offenders, which results in people being severely penalized by judges who think they are "taught a lesson" for crimes that do not justify that, therefore, the abundance of complaints about how much we spend people incarcerated in this country . We direct people to criminals for the same type of crimes for which others are given a pass, then we say that deserved . No, they deserved for future been spared, too, but were denied that opportunity because they were poor and, therefore, "bad".
Moreover, we have a system that defines what are capital offenses, and how they try. Allowing police officers to determine the guilt or innocence of a person at the point to the point of deciding whether or not they deserve to live or die. we are given every right to innocence until proven otherwise, we are granted the right to due process, a fair trial. And in the case of Philando Castilla, we are all issued our second amendment rights. encouraging any agent or agency to interfere with those rights is unconstitutional and, in the case of many people arguing, hypocritical.
3) When people try to say that those are raised without fathers , and that is why violence is so prevalent in their culture, understand that this is illogical, unhistorical and absurd. Historically, violence was Never a component of the black communities of the city center until the crack epidemic entered densely populated communities many of which most white left for a time when racism was defined boundary lines of the community . Combine that with real police corruption where the policemen look the other way while drug traffickers were paid made their land ; Annnnd raw, brutal reality of addiction and the way that forces people to do drastic things to feed your habit, and you have the perfect storm of inner city crime.
This is only proven by the fact that crime has been on a continuous decline for decades. decades . That drop in crime is what you see so many white people who meet again into the city, and much conversation about gentrification: finally safe again . Experts may be confused by the decline, but black Americans are not :. The crack epidemic is in decline, and violent crime took her
Currently, the national crime rate is about half of what it was at its peak in 1991. The crime violence has declined by 51 percent since 1991, and property crimes by 43 percent. In 2013, the violent crime rate was the lowest since 1970. And this is true for unreported crimes as well. According to the National Crime Victimization Survey, since 1993 rate violent crime has decreased from 79.8 to 23.2 victims per 1,000 people. Americans who lived through the 1960s and 1970s remember the fear associated with a real increase in violent crime. In fact, the violent crime rate increased by 126 percent between 1960 and 1970, and 64 percent between 1970 and 1980. [ source ]
What is Moreover, we assume that there was an absence of black parents in families somehow out of sync with the national average. Between police violence many have been subjected criminals are allowed to remain in the community and take their lives, and the number of cities that take them in prison for nonviolent crimes for silly reasons , I 'd say are a lot of reasons why many children grow up without a father.
is a little hard to take "personal responsibility" when you're work in different places to feed his family while the state your spouse is blocked for years for a joint , eh?
4) When you hear someone say, "black lives even matter blacks " or that "blacks have to worry about crime black on black first , "know that they are probably operating from a position of scarcity. They believe they can only take care of so many things, and they do not want to bear the responsibility of caring for people who do not even know, and can not be bothered to research.
Unfortunately, I can tell you one thing, as a person deeply connected both in my city and many cities around the country: there has never been a time when blacks no meet after a life taken in someone else's hands in the black community he was lost. There have been community activists and organizers in the black community to , as long as there has been a black community . A quick search on Google for "rally of violence" and the city is likely to pull up countless results showing the different sub-communities in communities working together to try to find out what it's happening.
Why have not succeeded? They have. Remember that these statistics from above? Crime. steady decline. For decades. And they often have without support from their local police departments.
Conversations on the crime of black on black also belie the reality that, as communities remain deeply Segregated more offense is committed against people sharing the same race as the author. Assault, robbery, assault, all crimes that may be committed against people in their own community, people's probably the same race as you. (No one said criminals were brilliant ... simply persistent .)
5) If you are told that the police is judging without knowing all the facts, I understand that you are talking to someone who is repeating what we have always been taught. A desire to know more about what happened, the desire to understand what contributes to the decision of a police pull the trigger against the whip out a stun gun, a need to hear that no involved racial bias in what captures police the way they do (or not do, for that matter), not about the trial. They are literally about getting more information so that can judge accurately.
However, for many people, questioning what happened at all it is out of bounds, because the call for information implies that there is reason to question the judgment of the police. police making decisions' must be irreproachable, they say. Police officers are human , and have biases like everyone else. And, like any other person who is given power over large swaths of people, we must ensure that they are not using the power in a way that harms communities for behavior that, as outsiders do not understand. racial bias in the US says that anyone who speaks Spanish is illegal, any black person is a criminal orphan in search of opportunity, and any Hijabi is a suicide. How the police themselves affected if they enter a community to think this way?
More importantly, how the public responds to the police if they know this is the way of thinking when you approach them?
This type of aggressive police surveillance damages only relate to the people who are paid to serve, and does less safe in doing their job. Refusing to engage the public about calls for transparency in why people (black and Native Americans, if we're being honest) are so overrepresented in the percentages of victims of killings related to the police only distrust is generated both sides. From that generates distrust and skepticism, ultimately, violence.
6) When you are told to hate the police or "thugs love," remember this is that "either or" politics of games that I mentioned. People fall on him as a pothole just keep running when they leave their driveways, without even thinking. I personally do not hate cops. In fact, as I said before, one of my earliest memories as a child is being carried out in a park in Cleveland by a police officer who rescued me when I was kidnapped as a child. But that's the same police department who shot a boy holding a toy rifle perfectly legal.
I value and appreciate the work that our officers. I also know that there is something very wrong when a child dies from playing with a toy, or a man who exercises his right to openly carry their weapon, or a Muslim walking through a hotel lobby, or, or, or ... .
You get the drift.
The assessment of police work does not mean that we do not have to be constant tuning to ensure that also serves us. Ensure that our police work, and is consistently effective through cities, it is the way all of us, not only to protect the flow of arms and drugs, but violence tends to come with them.
What can you do besides talk to? Push back on their peers or family when intolerant declarations flying out of their mouths. deny them the pleasure of your company, realize that they are not as forward thinking in their effort to be, and accept that they could not be with you when you reach the other side of the rainbow. Contact official Congress their senators their state and local authorities , and let them know that money they receive from the NRA is not it will be enough to help them buy the election this year . Find out when your mid-term elections are, and make sure the candidates know that monitoring of the reform is a serious matter.
Most importantly, practice empathy whenever you have to deal with people who think and live differently from you. When you say "All lives matter," understand that this is someone defending their right not to give a damn about what is happening outside their community. They are defending their right to apathy, the same apathy resulting in the damage that destroys communities and families alike. Nobody has ever said only black lives matter, no one has ever said black lives should be more important than anyone else, especially the police. We need them; we need each other. But we also need understanding and empathy, not apathy and skepticism.
all have to read more, think more, be more and do more. The information you really need to make important decisions will not come from the talking heads on television. I have been a talking head, so I know-the valuable information that can not be shared in two quick sentences short phrases, interrupted by commercial breaks, and then interrupted by another person inching their time to talk. We have to read books, and not be afraid to listen to each other. The most important thing is that we can not be afraid to think differently and to fight for the lives of loved ones and strangers. It is one of the best ways to make the world a better place for us all.
The post Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law appeared first on http://blackgirlsguidetoweightloss.com/the-op-eds/speak-out-but-do-more-than-that/
Thanks for Reading Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law
You are now reading the article Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law Url Address https://exerciseplanstoloseweight.blogspot.com/2016/07/speak-out-but-no-more-than-that.html
0 Response to "Speak out, but no more than that: Understand, Empathize, Law"
Posting Komentar