Title : Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you
link : Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you
Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you
In a quick and dirty version of "Good I coulda been told that "
according to a study to be published later this year by International Journal of Research in Marketing people snacks and drinks eating "light" like baked fries or diet sodas are likely to eat 13 percent more calories than people who eat full-fat snacks . This is because it is easier to justify exceeded when a food is labeled as healthy, according to lead study author Joost Pennings, professor of finance and marketing at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands.
Pennings told The Huffington Post that while snacks themselves can be effective, it is a question of how we react to the label.
"products" light "can help, but behavioral responses to the statement of light can wash the positive effect," he said. "Understanding the psychological effect of the claim that a product is" light "needs more research to ensure that the results" light "in a lower calorie intake by consumers." [ source ]
This is why both the language around 'pecking' I care about what .
The idea behind "eating light snacks" is, for many people, as snacks opportunity to feel comfortable without having to worry about calories. Now, I understand, but we must also be honest about what the ultimate goal is, in many cases :. To eat as much as necessary to get the full, without gaining weight
must also pay attention for writing in the preceding paragraph. People who eat sandwiches meaning of fat, which has more calories per gram than carbohydrates and so is usually more filling "light" has been removed in favor of adding more carbohydrates-eat much more than their snack chosen that're eating more of the same than it would if the full fat version. Which means that the switch light snacks ultimately means consuming date more carbohydrates. Uff.
The biggest problem with snacking is that it has been taught so many of us as mindless eating. You sit on the couch with your chosen treatment and Veg out. Without portion control. Regardless of hunger or satiety. It's just supposed to be this "spontaneous" thing that makes us dig in full.
That's nuts.
Many people end up eating snacks when they really need meals , and overeating snacks addict with fat and much less healthy protein, a definite disadvantage, almost the value of eating another meal calorie . The appetizers are filled up for long enough to last until the next meal, where they eat the full calorie meal voucher again .
Worst of all, the way people these light snacks are eaten seems to skirt the biggest problem of all: that discourages people to set limits to help them develop and maintain willpower. We all have to learn how and when to stop. We also have to learn some things, no matter how tasty they are, are not filled unless they are in such large portions that go against our objectives. And we must be able to cut ties with foods that make it difficult to establish these limits.
I'm not surprised in the least by this, and I suspected that an long time. I am glad that more people are realizing that today.
For more information on snacking:
Image Credit: Credit: flickr.com/trekkyandy
The post Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you appeared first on http://blackgirlsguidetoweightloss.com/the-study-guide/lighter-versions-snacks-actually-result-eating/
Thanks for Reading Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you
You are now reading the article Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you Url Address https://exerciseplanstoloseweight.blogspot.com/2016/05/study-says-eat-lighter-versions-of.html
0 Response to "Study says eat lighter versions '' of Snacks is worse for you"
Posting Komentar