Title : How bodybuilding should be judged
link : How bodybuilding should be judged
How bodybuilding should be judged
Iron Mag Geoff Roberts
humans are too corrupt to the subjectivity that increasingly is the main determining factor in any competition. For that reason, subjectivity is one of the great falls of the bodybuilding industry. The "human" to judge, factor often leaves the audience feeling cheated and competitors, or at least confusing. Bodybuilding is judged loosely based on specific criteria, although we are lead to believe that it is judged strictly on these criteria. To be of the view that judges have no bias or personal preferences, meaning that judges are not human beings at all. To make matters worse, fans and athletes have no idea how each judge claimed to have seen the program, causing a complete lack of personal responsibility for judges. In other words, as individuals, judges can get away with placing athletes the way they want, regardless of how inaccurate these placements could be related to the "criteria bodybuilding".
The first step to remedy these problems is to make decisions each and every individual judge public. In most other subjective sports, fans and athletes can see what each judge will decide separately before receiving your overall score. On one side of the top, this could make it much easier to detect if any of the judges are acting unfairly or corrupt. If eight judges have an athlete from 12 to 10th place, but the ninth judge has a solid first, something must be going on behind the scenes there. Of course, the highs and lows are expelled, but this is nothing more than a band-aid, which does not cure infection that is a corrupt judge. This change alone will not solve all our problems judging, as physicists are not yet broken down by individual criteria bodybuilding, but instead break down as a whole, blending together all the criteria. This leaves the judge with a large margin of error unnecessarily.
Bodybuilders should be judged based on criteria of each separately, unlike his physical being judged as a whole. Each athlete must obtain an individual score for each category of physical development, in regard to bodybuilding. These categories would be something along the lines of size, conditioning, balance and form. The importance of each category in relation to others could be predetermined for the best shape to finish in the winner's circle. For example, each category would be given a percentage of the overall score as follows: form 35%, 25% balance, conditioning 20%, 20% size. Each athlete will receive a score for each of these categories, the scores are available for all fans and athletes as soon as the judging is complete. These scores can be an easy scale of 1 to 10, or something similar. Therefore, if given a Dexter 5 in size, it would get 10% (due to the fact that the size is 20% of total), and if it was given a 10 in conditioning, which receive 20 %. A perfect score of 10 as a competitor would win 35%. The final scores would then be a total percentage.
To put it in perspective, in the Mr. Olympia, Shawn Rhoden would have received 10 per way (this is assuming that the lower part of the distended abdomen is not present) and a 7 size. Kai Greene confer a 6 for the shape and size of a 9 for. A good version of Phil (eg 2013) would receive a 9 for balance, 10 for the condition, 7 for size, and 7 form. This would Phil 22.5% equilibrium condition 20%, 14% for size and shape to 24.5%, for a total of 81%. These are the individual scores that drastically reduce the subjectivity of the sport. Just for the fun of it, we'll compare to Phil Ronnie Coleman in 2003, the use of this system. Ronnie gets a perfect score in size and conditioning, and at least one 9 in the balance. Unfortunately for Ronnie, form, which is its most obvious defect, is the most important aspect of this system. However, there would still drive a at least 6 in that category. In addition, The Big Nasty finishes in 83.5%. Again, this system would be in place, in part, to improve the shape and pleasingness physical, so a good Phil is able to get almost as good a score as The Big Nasty.
If athletes and fans were able to see the score of all bodybuilders in all categories, which would clear any funny business. It is difficult to decide who has the "best body" on stage, is much less difficult to decide who has the best form, conditioning or size. Fanless bodybuilding or privileged information they might argue the facts Shawn Rhoden receive an almost perfect score in terms of form, while Kai Ramy and receive an almost perfect score in the category of size. If a judge were to give Kai Greene June 1, 10 in the size category, or a 6 out of 10 Phil to maintain balance, the judge would have to be treated, because obviously are not judging properly. This system could increase the responsibility placed on judges by a wide margin. This division also help ensure that the physical that make up the pinnacle of our sport seeking the way a bodybuilder should look, while at the same time make our sport less dangerous for athletes.
At first glance, this system may seem too much work for the judges. You making each athlete score on a scale from 1 to 10 in four different categories, in fact, would be a bit much to ask. Fortunately, there is a simple and effective remedy. This solution not only makes judges more tolerable workload, but also serves to make the judge even less subjective than making public break scores and scores in categories reduce subjectivity alone. There would be eight judges in total, and two judges would be randomly assigned to each category of physical development. This would prevent judges from the results of the other judges, allowing them to focus exclusively on the category to which they were assigned, unlike the total score of the athlete.
Put more emphasis on form and balance would result in our sport is represented by a more pleasant, less grotesque physical. This result could have several positive effects on the sport, including a main draw more current, and a much larger demographic of people who might be interested in the sport. Even hardcore bodybuilding fans agree that physicists must return to the more pleasing, symmetrical bodies of the 1990s Putting less emphasis on the size and condition and the emphasis switching to pleasingness body could make this "back to the 90's a physical" desire a reality. Bodybuilding is, after all, a visual and artistic sport, so how or why can a person with a distended stomach or unpleasant lumps and bumps placed well in a bodybuilding show?
The dangers of bodybuilding elite level are well documented and have shown its ugly face several times over the last couple of years or so. Overall, the main source of danger in our sport comes through trying to achieve an incredibly low body fat level, while at the same time dehydration oneself to the point of eliminating most if not Subcutaneous all fluid. Our second most dangerous sport culprit is the attempt not controlled, random muscle size gain as much as humanly possible. Dangerous levels of drugs are involved in these two extreme efforts, although very different types of drugs. The first example often includes large amounts of diuretic drugs and fat burning, which have been accused of causing death in our industry. The latest example of size gains unadulterated drugs usually accompanied by less dangerous building muscle, which in high doses over time, can cause serious health problems as well.
modern bodybuilding is pushing the limits of what the human body is able to achieve in terms of muscle mass and low body fat, but these may not be the best limits to be pushing the to improve our sport. Why not expand the boundaries of muscle uniformity of a person can be a part of the body to another, or small waist of a man can be, while the huge amounts of muscle fun? Not only does this new system will serve to push the right as it limits, but as stated above, is reduced greatly subjectively of our sport, a quality in our industry that is frowned upon by most athletes and initiated. This is the direction of our sport needs head on by several fundamental, such as improving the health of athletes and the ability to market the sport more effectively, creating greater opportunities to increase revenue reasons.
Source: http://www.ironmagazine.com/2016/how-bodybuilding-should-be-judged/
The post How bodybuilding should be judged appeared first on http://xbodyconcepts.com/how-bodybuilding-should-be-judged/
Thanks for Reading How bodybuilding should be judged
You are now reading the article How bodybuilding should be judged Url Address https://exerciseplanstoloseweight.blogspot.com/2016/06/how-bodybuilding-should-be-judged.html
0 Response to "How bodybuilding should be judged"
Posting Komentar